Democracy vs. Economic Growth: Which Came First, the Chicken or the Egg?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18667/cienciaypoderaereo.660

Keywords:

Economic growth, democracy, development, political and economic institutions

Abstract

It has long been taught that democratic strength is the best remedy to gain economic development. In that sense, the broader the social freedoms, the greater the opportunities for the growth of a nation. However, with the rapid development of the Asian tigers, where democracy might not be the common denominator, this vision of development turned not only toward democratic strength but to the structure of institutions as well. Although democracy could remain as the main ingredient to achieve this longed-for and westernized economic development (Lipset, 1959a, 1959b), it is not necessarily the only variable to determine such progress; rather, is the type of institution what becomes essential in establishing incentives and creating better conditions to achieve a political and economic “take-off” of this kind. Hence, democracy, in the long term, would allow opening the way to development, although not without ignoring the importance of history in each country, which in the end determines singularities for the development of nations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Rodrigo Mezú, Fuerza Aérea Colombiana

    Magíster en Ciencia Política. Fuerza Aérea Colombiana. Grupo de Investigación Análisis en Contexto. Rol de investigador: teórico y escritura.

References

Acemoglu, D. (2012). Introduction to economic growth. Journal of economic theory, 147(2), 545-550.

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2000). Political losers as a barrier to economic development. American Economic Review, 90(2), 126-130.

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012, 18 de junio). 10 Reasons Countries Fall Apart. Foreign Policy, (194), 89.

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2014). Por qué fracasan los países. Los orígenes del poder, la prosperidad y la pobreza. Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales, 26, 139-146.

Acemoglu, D., Naidu, S., Restrepo, P., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). Democracy does cause growth. Journal of Political Economy, 127(1), 47-100.

Barro, R. J. (1996). Determinants of economic growth: A cross-country empirical study. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Baum, M. A., & Lake, D. A. (2003). The political economy of growth: democracy and human capital. American Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 333-347.

Bayart, J. F. (2010). Les études postcoloniales. Un carnaval académique. Politique étrangère, (4), 912-918.

Burkhart, R. E., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1994). Comparative democracy: The economic development thesis. American Political Science Review, 88(4), 903-910.

Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and development in Latin America. California: University of California Press.

Cheibub, J. A., Przeworski, A., Limongi, F. P., & Álvarez, M. M. (1996). What makes democracies endure? Journal of Democracy, 7(1), 39-55.

Feng, Y. (1997). Democracy, political stability and economic growth. British Journal of Political Science, 27(3), 391-418.

Haggard, S. (1990). Pathways from the periphery: The politics of growth in the newly industrializing countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (2008). Development, democracy, and welfare states: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Helliwell, J. F. (1994). Empirical linkages between democracy and economic growth. British journal of political science, 24(2), 225-248.

Heo, U., & Tan, A. C. (2001). Democracy and economic growth: A causal analysis. Comparative Politics, 33(4), 463-473.

Huntington, S. P. (1970). Political order in changing societies. VRÜ, Verfassung und Recht in Übersee, 3(2), 257-261.

King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326-343.

Krieckhaus, J. (2006). Democracy and economic growth: how regional context influences regime effects. British Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 317-340.

Leblang, D. A. (1996). Property rights, democracy and economic growth. Political Research Quarterly, 49(1), 5-26.

Linz, J. J., & Valenzuela, A. (Eds.). (1994). The failure of presidential democracy. Comparative perspectives Volume 1. Baltimore: Johns Hopkings University Press.

Lipset, S. M. (2001) Algunos requisites sociales de la democracia: Desarrollo económico y legitimidad política. En: 10 Textos Básicos de Ciencia Política. España: Ariel, pp. 113-150.

Lipset, S. M. (1959a). Political man: The social bases of politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkings University Press.

Lipset, S. M. (1959b). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69-105.

Londregan, J. B., & Poole, K. T. (1996). Does high income promote democracy? World politics, 49(1), 1-30.

Mainwaring, Scott and Aníbal Pérez-Liñán (2005). “Latin American Democratization since 1978: Democratic Transitions, Breakdowns and Erosions”. En: The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America. Advances and Setbacks, editado por Frances Hagopian y Scott Mainwaring. . United States of America. Cambridge University Press.

Mody, A., & Wang, F. Y. (1997). Explaining industrial growth in coastal China: economic reforms… and what else? The World Bank Economic Review, 11(2), 293-325.

Moore, B. (1966). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston: Beacon Press.

Needler, M. C. (1968). Political development and socioeconomic development: the case of Latin America. American Political Science Review, 62(3), 889-897.

Nelson, M. A., & Singh, R. D. (1998). Democracy, economic freedom, fiscal policy and growth in LDCs: a fresh look. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 46(4), 677-696.

O’Donnell, G. A. (1973). Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism: studies in South American politics. Berkeley: University of California Intl.

Olson, M. (1945). The varieties of Eurosclerosis: the rise and decline of nations since 1982. Economic growth in Europe since, 73-94.

Olson, M. (1984). Rise and decline of nations. Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. Connecticut :Yale University Press

Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Przeworski, A. (2004). Institutions matter? Government and opposition, 39(4), 527-540.

Przeworski, A., Álvarez, R. M., Álvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development: political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Przeworski, A., Limongi, F. P, Giner, S. (1995). Political regimes and economic growth. En: Democracy and development (pp. 3-27). Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sirowy, L., & Inkeles, A. (1990). The effects of democracy on economic growth and inequality: A review. Studies in Comparative International Development, 25(1), 126-157.

Tilly, C. (2017). War making and state making as organized crime. En. Collective violence, contentious politics, and social change (pp. 121-139). Londres: Routledge.

Wade, R. (2004). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Published

2020-11-11

Issue

Section

Management and Strategy

How to Cite

Democracy vs. Economic Growth: Which Came First, the Chicken or the Egg?. (2020). Ciencia Y Poder Aéreo, 15(2), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.18667/cienciaypoderaereo.660